[silence] Cage's calligraphic scores
Katherine Setar
setar@pacbell.net
Mon Dec 17 01:20:17 EST 2007
Regarding calligraphic scores: here's one other minor point from the
baby-boomer generation.
When I was studying composition/orchestration in the mid-1980's (in the
infancy of notation software) we were expected to do our big
orchestral projects (specifically, writing out parts) using indelible
Indian ink and a calligraphy pen. The nib (tip) allows you to write
lines of different thicknesses by changing the angle and pressure of
your writing. However, this very ability also forces you to alter your
writing from the printing/handwriting created using a pencil or
ballpoint pen.
Just a small point from a less technological age,
Katherine Setar
silence-request@list.mail.virginia.edu wrote:
> 1. Re: Cage's calligraphic scores (kos@pa
>
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, kkrka kr <haajg5@gmail.com>
>
>> By "calligraphic" I mean that the scores are carefully prepared handwritten
>> copies that all conform to a particular typeface.
[snip]
>
> It's really a simple matter that most composers know: When you can't afford
> copyists, you learn how to write neatly. That doesn't mean that you need to
> write neatly all the time. If you're sketching out material for yourself, of
> course you don't need to go through the trouble of calculating physical
> distance of everything on the page.
More information about the silence
mailing list