[silence] Petr Kotik's Umbilical Cord
Brian Brandt
mode@moderecords.com
Sun Dec 14 00:35:17 EST 2008
Having worked with Cage directly on a number of recordings over 9 years,
in addition to sitting with him at a couple of festivals of his music, I
must say that the "oral" tradition of Cage is important. The scores tell
you just so much. Hearing Cage interact with the performers and shedding
additional insight tells you much more. Yes, certain performers (eg
Tudor) would be given carte blanche with the score -- they already
worked directly with Cage and knew his thinking and preferences. They
proved themselves and he trusted them. Cage would be very helpful to
musicians that were trying to execute his scores well. He would have
little comment (and polite impatience) with musicians that really were
hopeless or not serious. I think in his later years he resigned himself
to the fact that his music would sometimes be performed poorly and there
was no need to try to change a hopeless situation. And, by the way,
"hopeless" is a verbatim quote: once at a live performance of his
"Concerto for Prepared Piano" which Mode was recording, he turned to me
to say that "this is hopeless". So that was the end of that recording --
and this is of a written out "early" work!
As for major orchestras performing his works well: yes, the calibre of
musicianship in younger musicians never ceases to amaze me. And perhaps
they may (or likely may not) change the orchestra's attitude toward
works that are not finite in on the page. But, for now, orchestras are
not ready to just perform Cage's late scores, nor are they ready for
something like "Atlas Eclipticalis". Most of the orchestra don't want to
think about the score and make choices. They want to play their gig,
collect their check and go home. It's a job. The majority won't take
such scores seriously and the result will be an approximation at best.
Chamber works are a different matter: you can assemble a group of
musicians who are keen to interpret these works seriously and correctly.
Orchestras are a subset of "society". Some members are inquisitive and
curious, others would simply prefer to have a beer with someone like
George Bush.
Through anarchy, Cage hoped to see a new and better society. His late
works are perhaps a roadmap toward that effect. Let's face it, society
is not ready for anarchy yet -- today it practically has achieved
anarchy by the collapse of worldwide governmental and financial systems.
Does the world's response to such "chaos" indicate that it is ready for
anarchy and for everyone (orchestras included) to be responsible for
themselves and their actions? I wish Cage were here today so I could ask
him his opinions of the world's current condition. And please, listen to
or read his works "Overpopulation and Art" (on mode 130) or "Lecture on
the Weather"-- Cage's comments and insight from decades ago are wholly
relevant today. Pure perceptive genius, these texts could have been
written today.
Regarding the two performances of "103" on the Mode DVD (mode 174): to
my knowledge, neither was actually conducted. I was not at the recording
sessions. The orchestras were thoroughly prepared by the conductors
involved prior to the performance.
Brian Brandt
www.moderecords.com
Glenn Freeman wrote:
>>>> To perform the work? Yes. To perform the work well is another
>>>> question.
>>>>
>>> OK, and what authority figure will decide what is well and what is
>>> not?
>>>
>> Authority figure?
>>
>
> who decides what is "well"?
>
>
>>> I never said irrelevant, I said not required.
>>>
>> So then you agree that the statements outside the score can have a
>> beneficial effect on performance. How would you revise your previous
>> remarks to make them consistent with this?
>>
>
> no need to revise.
>
>
>> Have you heard of the stories of the attempts by major orchestras to
>> perform Cage's works in his presence during his lifetime? You might
>> find them enlightening.
>>
>
> feel free to provide an oral history of such attempts if you like, but
> the past is gone.
>
> cage has been dead since 1992. his number pieces for orchestra were
> all written within 5 years of his death. that is, 6 major orchestral
> works [not including various re-combinations] i would describe as
> cage's 6 late symphonies. they all remain unperformed by the major
> orchestras of our day.
>
> today's orchestras, quite a bit different than the orchestras of the
> 1960s and 70s (aside from the conductor issue), would encounter no
> problems performing these symphonies. i soon hope to hear the major
> orchestras of the world performing Cage's 6 final symphonies on a
> regular basis.
>
> Glenn Freeman
> OgreOgress productions
> http://ogreogress.com
>
> --
> To join or leave the Silence mailing list, please go to https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/silence.
> You can find searchable list archives at http://list.mail.virginia.edu/pipermail/silence/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.mail.virginia.edu/pipermail/silence/attachments/20081214/18689eaf/attachment-0001.html
More information about the silence
mailing list