[silence] Don't Get Your Hopes Up!
Glenn Freeman
glenn@ogreogress.com
Mon Dec 15 17:46:51 EST 2008
Brian Brandt wrote:
> All of which goes to say that major orchestras can do well with
these pieces, especially given
> a sympathetic conductor. However, I don't think you should hold
your breath for their recordings
> of any of these works -- you may suffocate. But one can always hope.
Reminds me of one of my favorite Robert Ashley songs:
http://www.last.fm/music/Robert+Ashley/_/Don't+Get+Your+Hopes+Up
Instead of hoping, what actions can be taken to change the situation?
Are any professional orchestras willing to program any of the below
works? There are plenty of professional orchestras (http://www.musicweb-international.com/orchestras/orch-Am.htm
).
Sixty-Eight (1992)
Seventy-Four (1992)
Eighty (1992)
Twenty-Six, Twenty-Eight and Twenty-Nine [Eighty-Three] (1991)
101 (1989)
103 (1991)
108 (1991)
One 'selling point' to managers and musicians is there will be no
conductor (conductors are often paid 10 times or more than the players
they conduct). How can something be programmed without the approval of
a conductor? Bit tricky, hmm? And we come back to that old
question ... who decides what is well?
Seriously, when was the last time any of the above works were
performed aside from the premiere, or for the purpose of making a
recording?
Glenn Freeman
OgreOgress productions
http://ogreogress.com
More information about the silence
mailing list